usocks
0x2e43e18a19ae896c6f8657ca6285b9672f67f7d2Links supplied by GG where no quests profile is linked. Ownership unverified.
One dossier and vote tally, shared across this project’s calls.
Sign in with an allowed account to vote and request research.
The thesis
The original GG link is a referral. We may earn a commission.
Dossier: usocks
Open project pageEthereum protocol that uses a Uniswap v4 hook to mint sock NFTs when 100M usocks is bought from the official ETH pool. Revealing burns 2M tokens, locks six onchain traits, and starts a weighted share of LP fees paid in ETH; each NFT must stay backed by 100M tokens or it is burned. The same stack later added Sock Market, an ownerless token launchpad, and Lucky Socks, a 5M-token NFT raffle.
Readout
- price
- $5.87e-7
- 24h vol
- $1.7k
- mcap
- $56.4k
- liquidity
- $27.6k
- holders
- 247
- 24h
- -0.1%
LP unlockedmint not renounced
- calls on gg
- 1
- first called at
- $145.2k
- since
- 0.40x
Last onchain reading for usocks on eth, not live. gg records that someone called it, never that they were right.
Notable
- Official site and @usocks_fun cite token 0x2E43E18a19Ae896c6f8657Ca6285b9672f67F7D2; token, NFT, hook, locker and factories are listed as verified on Etherscan.
- Docs claim a 95/3/2 LP-fee split to revealed NFTs, an official address, and buyback-and-burn, plus no pause or upgrade admin and protocol LP with no withdrawal path.
- Sock Market (factory 0xbf8D03E2E5C7747d67683B391797Da3caA55AfB4) and Lucky Socks went live on Ethereum after the token, per the project's own posts.
- Distinct from Uniswap's 2019 Unisocks (SOCKS at 0x23B608675a2B2fB1890d3ABBd85c5775c51691d5); the name and sock motif overlap Uniswap lore.
- Etherscan reports about 96.06B remaining of a 100B start and about 247 holders; GeckoTerminal listed about $61k mcap and $74k Uniswap v4 liquidity.
Unverified
- Team is unnamed; @usocks_fun was created 2026-08-10 and no prior-project attribution was found.
- No public GitHub repository found, despite docs claiming the protocol is fully open source.
- No security audit is listed on Etherscan.
- X-account ownership of the contracts is not proven; the deployer address was not identified from the explorer scrape.
Project discussion, shared with its dossier and every GG call linked to this project.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
Nothing said yet.
