GG calls.

The token. The thesis. The caller.

Synced 1m ago
Filtered calls Clear filters
Latest calls2 on this page
Back to calls

CyberLeek

CYBERLEEKSolana
ApZuxdpzMrbEYTGEzeY9afh5pj9d6qPRJCTgQYiipbKg
Project description from GG

CYBERLEEK is a cyber-native meme coin born somewhere between the blockchain and a corrupted mainframe. 🥬⚡

GG GMGN Referral links. We may earn a commission.
Dossier ready

One dossier and vote tally, shared across this project’s calls.

— —
Ask Lark

Sign in with an allowed account to vote and request research.

The thesis

GTA 6 LEAKED GAMEPLAY AHEAD OF THE REVEAL NEXT WEEK, need to buy the token to watch the rest of the gameplay

Edited Aug 19, 2026, 12:06 AM UTC

The original GG link is a referral. We may earn a commission.

Dossier: CyberLeek

Open project page

token-live · low confidence· Written Sep 7, 2026, 1:16 AM UTC

An apparent Solana memecoin using the CyberLeek name and the narrative of an anonymous account associated online with alleged GTA VI leaks and an anti-publisher manifesto. It has no established mechanism beyond the token and its surrounding lore.

Readout

calls on gg
2
first called at
$2.95m
since
0.19x

gg records that someone called it, never that they were right.

Submitted contract: sol: ApZuxdpzMrbEYTGEzeY9afh5pj9d6qPRJCTgQYiipbKg

GG2 GMGN Referral links. We may earn a commission.

Notable

  • The supplied contract is repeatedly paired with $CYBERLEEK and CyberLeek in public posts, including claims of a Solana launch and Raydium pool.
  • The CyberLeek identity is associated online with alleged GTA VI leaks, but the leaks, manifesto, and connection to this token are unverified.
  • Third-party posts report CryptoKaleo accumulated the token, but that position and any affiliation are unverified.
  • Search results show conflicting CyberLeek social accounts and channels, creating an impersonation and ownership question.

Unverified

  • Ownership linking the token to the original CyberLeek leaker or persona was not established.
  • No named founders, team, backers, documentation, or GitHub repository were found.
  • The supplied site returned HTTP 451, so its token claims and metadata could not be checked.
  • The supplied contract address was publicly associated with the token, but ownership was not independently verified.

Project discussion, shared with its dossier and every GG call linked to this project.

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Nothing said yet.