You are reading a saved edition, not live news. News window: 17 Sept, 12:45 UTC to 18 Sept, 12:45 UTC. Labelled ongoing and upcoming items retain their own dates.
Solana: some research could not be published. Available stories remain below.
The catch-up
News from the last 24 hours, plus clearly dated ongoing developments and upcoming events.
Supercoin and Solana present ZARsc, a licensed Rand stablecoin, as live on Solana
@solana quoted @supercoinxyz saying ZARsc is live on Solana. Supercoin's 18 September post says Super Money South Africa, an FSCA-licensed Crypto Asset Service Provider (FSP 53458), issued the Rand-pegged token onto Solana, with onshore Absa reserves, monthly Moore South Africa checks, Fireblocks custody, and Chainalysis screening. Supercoin lists mint 5ekaHEqpRUXH4RoZVRMErdJE74bibWAzihMtPcjKyceQ. An earlier Supercoin note already called ZARsc available on Orca on 2 September, so today's posts are a public issuance write-up, not proof of a first onchain mint in this window.
Robinhood backs the SEC innovation exemption for onchain tokenized stocks
@RobinhoodApp said it supports the @SECGov innovation exemption. The company said Americans should have access to crypto technology, including instant settlement, 24/7 trading, and fractionalization by default. The post is a policy stance, not a product launch. It does not say Robinhood, Robinhood Wallet, or Robinhood Chain is a Tokenized Securities Venue, or that stock tokens already trading on the chain now qualify under the order.
Why it matters Robinhood already offers tokenized stocks and runs Robinhood Chain. The SEC order is a five-year, conditional U.S. path for permissioned onchain trading of real listed shares. The tweet shows the brokerage wants that path. It does not by itself change deposits, listings, or who can trade those tokens today.
Robinhood is a U.S. brokerage with a crypto app, a self-custodial wallet, and Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum layer 2 that went live on 1 July 2026. The chain was built for tokenized stocks and other onchain trading. Outside developers also use it to launch tokens and run DEXs. Tokenized stocks are blockchain representations of shares. Some versions aim to carry the same economic and legal rights as the listed stock. Others are synthetic price trackers. The SEC's 17 September Innovation Exemption is aimed at the first kind, traded in permissioned automated market maker pools, not at every stock-named token on a public chain. Robinhood's post does not claim the brokerage has applied to operate a Tokenized Securities Venue, and it does not list which of its stock-token products would meet the order's same-rights, issuer-notice, U.S.-person, and volume-limit conditions. Readers who use Robinhood Chain apps or stock tokens should watch whether any Robinhood venue, wallet flow, or chain market later says it is relying on the exemption. Until then, treat this as political and product-roadmap context, not a live trading-rule change inside the app.
Robinhood Ventures Fund I puts $25 million into Crusoe's $3.9 billion round
@RobinhoodApp said Robinhood Ventures Fund I invested $25 million in @CrusoeAI as part of Crusoe's $3.9 billion Series F, which values the company at $30.9 billion. Robinhood's newsroom says the purchase of preferred stock closed on 31 August 2026 and was announced on 17 September. RVI is a New York Stock Exchange closed-end fund meant to give ordinary investors exposure to private companies. Crusoe builds energy-first AI data centers and cloud infrastructure. This is a fund holding, not a Robinhood Chain, wallet, or crypto-app launch.
Why it matters RVI is a listed Robinhood vehicle, so the Crusoe stake is now part of what RVI holders are exposed to. It does not add a token, DEX, or chain feature. Crypto readers should not read it as a Robinhood Chain adoption story.
Robinhood Ventures Fund I began trading on the NYSE on 6 March 2026 under the ticker RVI. It is a closed-end fund advised by Robinhood Ventures, a registered investment adviser owned by Robinhood Markets. The newsroom list of holdings after this announcement includes Airwallex, Boom, Canva, Crusoe, Databricks, ElevenLabs, Mercor, OpenAI, Oura, Ramp, Revolut, SpaceX, Stripe, and Whatnot. Unlike a typical venture fund, RVI shares can be bought without accreditation or a minimum check, though the underlying private companies stay illiquid and the fund itself is high risk. Crusoe started as a crypto-adjacent energy business and now sells AI factories and cloud. Reuters and Crusoe's own round coverage say the Series F was co-led by Atreides Management, Mubadala Capital, and Valor Equity Partners, with Nvidia and others in the syndicate. Robinhood's disclosure is that RVI bought about $25 million of preferred stock in that round. No Robinhood Chain integration, token listing, or customer product was announced with the investment.
Upcoming: 29 Sept, 22:30 UTC. Announced 16 Sept, 15:49 UTC.
Robinhood will livestream HOOD Summit on 29-30 September for new active-trader tools
@RobinhoodApp told followers to tune in 29-30 September. Official pages put HOOD Summit '26 in Houston, with Chairman and CEO Vlad Tenev's keynote at 5:30 p.m. Central on 29 September, livestreamed in the Robinhood app, on X, YouTube and robinhood.com/presents. The company says the keynote will show new tools for active traders, and that 30 September main-stage sessions will also stream. No product list, including any Robinhood Chain feature, has been published. The dates are announced, not a guaranteed launch.
Why it matters This is a scheduled product window for Robinhood users and anyone watching Robinhood Chain, not a live button. Treat social rumors as unverified until the livestream names what is shipping, where, and when.
Robinhood Chain is Robinhood's permissionless Ethereum Layer 2, built on Arbitrum technology, using ETH for gas and aimed at tokenized stocks and onchain apps. HOOD Summit is the company's annual event. A 10 August newsroom post already set Houston for 29-30 September. The 16 September teaser does not change those dates. In late September, Central Time is daylight time (UTC-5), so 5:30 p.m. CT is 22:30 UTC. Specific chain, wallet or brokerage features remain unnamed until the keynote.
1 story did not pass publication checks. This does not mean nothing happened. Available stories are shown below.
New this edition
Supercoin and Solana present ZARsc, a licensed Rand stablecoin, as live on Solana
@solana quoted @supercoinxyz saying ZARsc is live on Solana. Supercoin's 18 September post says Super Money South Africa, an FSCA-licensed Crypto Asset Service Provider (FSP 53458), issued the Rand-pegged token onto Solana, with onshore Absa reserves, monthly Moore South Africa checks, Fireblocks custody, and Chainalysis screening. Supercoin lists mint 5ekaHEqpRUXH4RoZVRMErdJE74bibWAzihMtPcjKyceQ. An earlier Supercoin note already called ZARsc available on Orca on 2 September, so today's posts are a public issuance write-up, not proof of a first onchain mint in this window.
Why it matters Readers following Solana payments can inspect a non-USD stablecoin with a named South African licence, bank reserve, and mint. The evidence supports a public Supercoin and Solana presentation, not a claim that ZARsc first appeared onchain today or that U.S. users can buy it.
Supercoin is a South African issuer backed by NYSE-listed Super Group (SGHC). It describes ZARsc as a Rand-pegged SPL token meant for moving Rand value on Solana rather than as a speculative asset. The 18 September Supercoin article includes a Solana Foundation payments quote from Maya Caddle and says reserves stay onshore at Absa, with monthly assurance reports published on Supercoin's site. Supercoin also names Luno, VALR, and OVEX as venues. A 2 September Supercoin article already said ZARsc was available on Orca, Solana's DEX, so onchain access predated this window. Footer text on some Supercoin pages still gives conflicting consumer-wallet dates; those dates are not used here. Supercoin does not, in the posts reviewed, publish circulating supply, U.S. eligibility, or a new DEX listing unique to 18 September.
Rumble RUM is listed on Solana via Sunrise, with Raydium trading live
@sunrise said $RUM is listed on Solana and issued by Backpack Securities. It posted canonical mint RUMsPfFZFnN1ZmGANwP7FNMjKH4m9RiMePrtVtLe7 as the Solana version. Hours later, @Raydium said $RUM is live on Raydium, calling Rumble a video-sharing and cloud company now trading around the clock via Sunrise and Backpack Securities. Sunrise is a Solana listing venue that brings assets, including tokenized stocks, onto DEX markets. The posts do not publish U.S. eligibility, redemption mechanics, or any claim that this ticker falls under the SEC Innovation Exemption.
Why it matters Solana users can inspect a Rumble ticker in a wallet and trade it on Raydium if the pool is live, which is a different product from Nasdaq-hours RUM shares. That matters for anyone comparing tokenized-stock venues after the SEC's exemption news. Readers still need issuer terms before treating the token as a claim on the listed stock. The mint Sunrise posted is the identifier to check against copycat tickers.
Sunrise lists assets on Solana and coordinates a canonical token plus day-one liquidity. Its docs describe a partnership with Backpack Securities in which Backpack handles brokerage-side issuance of tokenized equities and Sunrise handles the onchain listing. That pipeline has already been used for other tickers. Rumble, ticker RUM on Nasdaq, runs a video platform and, after buying Northern Data, a cloud and AI infrastructure business. On 17 September Sunrise said RUM was listed on Solana via that Backpack Securities route and published mint RUMsPfFZFnN1ZmGANwP7FNMjKH4m9RiMePrtVtLe7, calling it the canonical Solana version. Raydium, a major Solana DEX, later said the token was live there for 24/7 trading. Those are listing and venue posts. They do not, in the evidence reviewed, attach a prospectus, a 1:1 redemption workflow for this ticker, or a statement that U.S. persons can buy it. Other Sunrise stock tokens have been described as redeemable for real shares in separate cases; that should not be copied onto RUM without RUM-specific terms. The listing is also separate from the SEC's 17 September Innovation Exemption, which applies to permissioned Tokenized Securities Venues trading tokenized NMS stock under stated conditions, not to every DEX ticker that shares a stock's name. Traders should confirm the mint, the issuer name on the Sunrise record, and the pool they are using. Fake RUM memecoins exist on Solana under other addresses.
Base delays Batches 004 team names to 29 September after 750 applications
@base said Base Batches 004 drew more than 750 applications, a record, so the selected teams will be announced on 29 September. An earlier @base post said 10 early-stage teams would receive up to $100,000 in investment subject to diligence, eight weeks of mentorship, and a Demo Day place in New York. Applications had already closed on 10 September. The new post changes the announcement date. It does not change the prize terms stated in those posts, and selection is still not a completed investment.
Why it matters Base Batches is Coinbase/Base's accelerator for early onchain teams. Builders who applied, and users who follow Demo Day launches, now have a dated checkpoint. It is a program schedule change, not a chain upgrade or token launch.
Base is Coinbase's Ethereum layer 2. Base Batches is a recurring program that puts a small set of early-stage teams through mentorship and, if diligence clears, a capped investment, then a public Demo Day. The 004 application window closed on 10 September 2026 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific, according to Base's earlier post. Today's update is that screening is taking longer because more than 750 teams applied. The 29 September date is an announced reveal, not a guarantee that ten deals close that day or that every listed benefit lands unchanged. Tokenized equities were not part of this announcement. @buildonbase separately hosted a tokenized-equities builder roundtable the same afternoon and repeated that tokenized equities are not available to U.S. users. That roundtable is discussion, not a listing.
Base and Ethereum still split on wallet standards, and Cobalt's published list omits EIP-8130
Ethlabs’ @decentrek said talks to merge Base-led EIP-8130 with Ethereum’s EIP-8141 broke down last week. Both drafts aim to make wallets easier with passkeys, apps paying fees and bundled actions. CoinDesk reports wallets that span both networks may have to support two transaction formats. Neither design is live on mainnet. Base's official Cobalt page now dates Sepolia to 23 September 2026 and mainnet to 30 September 2026, listing B20 changes, validity transactions, dynamic upgrades and a TEE migration, not EIP-8130.
Why it matters Wallet and app teams that assumed a shared September ship for Base native accounts should re-read Cobalt's feature list. Ethereum's Hegotá track and Base's test work can still move, but they are no longer one standard.
Account abstraction is the effort to make crypto wallets feel closer to normal apps: sign in with a passkey, let an app pay the fee, and batch several steps into one confirmation. Base pushed EIP-8130 for scale, customization and compliance. Ethereum's EIP-8141, also called Frame Transactions, is aimed at censorship resistance, privacy and post-quantum readiness. After months of talks, that merge attempt failed. CoinDesk's 16 September write-up is why the split is still the live watch item: multi-chain wallets may need two transaction formats. EIP-8141 remains a must-ship candidate for Ethereum’s Hegotá upgrade. EIP-8130 has been exercised on Base’s Vibenet test network. An earlier assumption that EIP-8130 would ride Base's September Cobalt upgrade does not match Base's current Cobalt documentation, which instead lists B20 token-standard improvements, validity transactions that execute only when onchain conditions match, dynamic node upgrades in metrics-only mode on mainnet, and a move of Base infrastructure into a Trusted Execution Environment. Those Cobalt dates are published targets, not a guarantee, and the official page does not give a clock time. B20 itself has been live on Base mainnet since the June Beryl upgrade. It is a native, ERC-20 compatible token type with issuer controls. That is separate from the wallet-standard fight.
Arc's SF drone show pairs a USDC nanopayment demo with up to $1M in planned builder capital
@arc said 850 drones would light the San Francisco skyline on 17 September and that eligible teams building on Arc could receive up to $1 million. A later Arc post linked a live broadcast. Arc's drones page says one drone negotiated a USDC recharge that settled on Arc as a machine-to-machine nanopayment demo. A footnote on that page says the $1 million figure reflects Circle Ventures' current plans to deploy capital at its discretion. It is not a guaranteed grant round, a public fund offering, or a dated application window. The separate Arc Microgrants program remains the dated $500 USDC path.
Why it matters Builders looking at Circle's new USDC-gas chain can see a public demo of small Arc payments and a stated Circle Ventures intention to fund teams. They should treat the $1 million figure as a plan, not an award, and use the Microgrants page if they need a close date.
Arc is Circle's USDC-gas layer 1, which opened public mainnet on 16 September. The drone page presents the San Francisco show as a celebration of that launch and of developers, then uses one drone as an example of agent-style payments: negotiate a rate, pay in USDC, settle in under a second. The same page links Circle's broader funding narrative and states that "Arc Builders Fund" is a descriptive label for a Circle Ventures internal initiative, that no fund vehicle is being formed, and that any capital may differ from amounts described. That is a different product from Arc Microgrants, which is a 10,000 USDC pool of twenty $500 awards for live mainnet mini apps with a 14 October 2026 submission close. The drone show itself is a marketing event plus a claimed onchain demo, not a new mainnet feature release.
Arc Studio launches as an AI workspace to generate and export Arc apps
@arc introduced Arc Studio, an AI workspace at studio.arc.io for building onchain apps on Arc, Circle's USDC-gas layer 1 that opened public mainnet on 16 September. Arc's blog says a user describes an idea in plain language and Studio generates frontend, backend, and smart contracts, with Circle stack integrations, and that the code can be exported and inspected. Apps can be tested across nine chains, including Arc, Base, and Ethereum. Circle says Studio does not deploy, sign, fund, or submit mainnet transactions for the user. Generated code can be wrong or unsafe.
Why it matters Day-two Arc needs builders, not only launch partners. Studio lowers the first-prototype step, but it is not a audited live app store. Anyone using it on mainnet still has to review, deploy, and fund transactions themselves.
Arc is Circle's layer 1 for dollar payments, tokenized assets, and onchain apps. Fees are paid in USDC. Public mainnet opened on 16 September 2026 with a permissioned validator set. Arc Studio is offered by Circle Technology Services as an AI coding agent. The 17 September blog says it understands Circle tools such as CCTP, Contracts, Gateway, and Wallets, and can pull in protocol components from partners including Aave, Morpho, and Uniswap, with whom Circle has commercial relationships. Developers can start in the browser or drive Studio from tools such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. The same post is explicit about limits: AI output may be inaccurate, incomplete, or insecure; Studio does not interact with mainnet on the user's behalf; mainnet use is the user's own credentials and risk. That distinction matters on a chain that is only a day old. Studio is a build path, not proof that a given generated app is safe or licensed.
Arc offers 20 microgrants of $500 USDC for live mainnet mini apps
@arc said it will award 20 microgrants of $500 USDC to eligible early builders shipping working mini apps on Arc mainnet. The Arc House page puts the pool at 10,000 USDC and says submissions need a live mainnet link and a public repo. Submissions close 14 October 2026 at 23:59 ET, with all decisions by 21 October. Testnet-only work, mockups, and projects already funded by a Circle or Arc program are ineligible. Payout is in USDC on Arc after verification. Awards are not guaranteed, and program counts can change.
Why it matters This is a concrete, small-dollar path onto a one-day-old chain. It is for deployed experiments, not slide decks. Builders need USDC on Arc for gas. It is separate from Circle's larger production grant program.
Arc opened public mainnet on 16 September 2026. Microgrants are meant for side projects, prototypes, hackathon follow-ons, and first deployments rather than funded startups. The rules allow individuals and teams worldwide, subject to sanctions screening, and allow pseudonymous submissions until payout verification. One submission is allowed per project. Recipients keep their intellectual property. Because Arc charges gas in USDC, a submitter already has to hold and spend USDC on Arc to have a live app. That is a real hurdle and also the point of the program: prove something runs on the new chain. Circle also advertises a separate developer grant program for production teams building on Arc and Circle's stack, with milestone-based funding. The microgrant page says it will route more advanced projects toward that program. Neither grant is an investment, listing, or user-facing app launch.
Nostra pauses its Starknet money market after a $3.5 million NSTR oracle borrow
@nostrafinance said a manipulated NSTR oracle price let one account borrow about $3.5 million of ETH, STRK, USDC, USDT, WBTC, and DAIv1 against NSTR collateral in the Nostra money market on Starknet. Lending, borrowing, withdrawals, and liquidations are paused while the team reconciles each asset and traces funds. Final loss and recoveries are not yet known. @GoPlusSecurity later described a thin NSTR pool used to spike the oracle print. The Crypto Times, citing PeckShield, reported about $1.92 million bridged to Ethereum. Nostra has not confirmed those wallet-level figures or the oracle vendor.
Why it matters Anyone using Nostra, NSTR, or other low-liquidity tokens as Starknet lending collateral should assume the money market is frozen and ignore recovery DMs. The case is a collateral-pricing failure at one app, not a Starknet or Ethereum chain halt.
Nostra is a lending, swap, and bridge app that has been building on Starknet and has also discussed Monad. NSTR is its native token. In the 17 September disclosure, Nostra said the incident was confined to the Starknet money market and warned that it will never DM users or ask them to connect a wallet as part of recovery. GoPlus published a timeline that starts at 05:23 UTC on 17 September with creation of a thinly funded NSTR/SolvBTC pool, then a short window of wash trading and swaps that printed NSTR near $49.5 before the borrow. Independent recaps note that NSTR's circulating market cap was under $600,000, so the borrowed basket was several times the collateral token's entire market. Open questions include the oracle provider for NSTR, whether the $3.5 million is realized bad debt or gross borrowed notional, and any depositor haircut. Updates are supposed to follow on Discord and in a post-mortem.
SEC issues a five-year Innovation Exemption for permissioned onchain stock trading
@SECGov said the Commission issued a temporary, conditional order so Tokenized Securities Venues can trade tokenized NMS stock through permissioned automated market makers and liquidity pools without being treated as an exchange under the Exchange Act. Liquidity providers can get parallel relief from dealer registration. Chairman Atkins said a venue must be a U.S. person, keep access permissioned, reject synthetics that lack the same rights as the listed share, and let issuers object. Relief expires five years after publication. It is not coverage for every stock token already trading on crypto apps.
Why it matters This is the first SEC path for onchain trading of real U.S. listed shares in AMM-style pools. It matters for tokenization venues, issuers, and chains that can host public, auditable contracts. Permissionless synthetic stock tokens are outside this order. Public comment is open on next steps.
NMS stock means shares that already trade in the U.S. national market system, such as names listed on the NYSE or Nasdaq. Tokenization here means a blockchain token that is supposed to carry the same rights as that share, including dividends and voting, issued by or for the company or by an unaffiliated third party. The order creates Tokenized Securities Venues: operators of permissioned AMM liquidity pools plus access rules. Those venues get a time-limited exemption from the Exchange Act definition of exchange. Some liquidity providers get an exemption from the dealer definition. Conditions in the press release and Atkins statement include symbol and volume limits, same rights as the traditional share, written notice and an objection right for issuers when a third party tokenizes the stock, public auditable smart contracts on a public permissionless ledger, trading halts that match the primary listing exchange, public reporting, OFAC compliance, and U.S.-person status for the venue. Anti-fraud rules still apply. The Commission asked for comment on changes and follow-on rulemaking. The Senate had just failed to advance the CLARITY Act. This staff-and-commission order is a narrower, temporary substitute, not a market-structure statute. Robinhood, Solana, Base, and other chains are relevant only if a venue on those networks actually meets the conditions and relies on the exemption.
CFTC staff expands no-action relief to passive trading software providers
@CFTC said its Market Participants Division issued a no-action position for providers of passive software. Subject to specified conditions, staff will not recommend enforcement against those providers or their relevant personnel for failing to register as an introducing broker, or as an associated person of one, when the software is provided and marketed so users can trade with registered futures commission merchants, introducing brokers, and designated contract markets. The release says the position is similar to Staff Letter 26-09, the earlier Phantom wallet relief, and is now broadly available. It is staff relief, not a Commission rule.
Why it matters Wallets and other software that pass users to regulated futures, options, or event-contract markets had been in a grey zone. This letter generalizes Phantom-specific relief. It does not bless every crypto bot, and providers still have to meet the letter's conditions, including not stepping into a broker's role.
An introducing broker is a person who solicits or accepts commodity-interest orders without holding customer margin. Crypto wallets that display derivatives or prediction-market buttons have worried they might fall into that category. In March the CFTC staff gave Phantom a tailored no-action letter (Staff Letter 26-09) for self-custodial wallet software that routes users to registered firms and designated contract markets. Letter 26-25, announced 17 September as CFTC press release 9300-26, says a similar position is now available more broadly to passive software providers. The official release does not reprint every condition. Secondary reporting describes limits such as not taking custody, not choosing where orders go, and keeping the user a customer of the registered firm rather than of the software provider. Those extra details should be checked against the staff letter itself at cftc.gov. The relief lasts until staff or the Commission replaces it. It can matter for wallets on Solana, Ethereum, Base, and elsewhere that want to attach regulated event contracts or other CFTC products. It is not a registration holiday for discretionary trading agents or for platforms that hold customer funds.