Tenev says public companies should not veto Robinhood stock tokens after AMC clash
@vladtenev , CEO of Robinhood, posted on 11 September that issuers should not get a veto over separately issued stock tokens that only reference freely traded shares. Robinhood Stock Tokens live on Robinhood Chain, the broker's Ethereum layer-2, and are 1:1 backed instruments that give economic exposure without putting holders on a company's shareholder register. The post answers AMC CEO Adam Aron, who called the AMC-linked tokens a fake market and threatened to take the dispute to the SEC. No new company reply or regulator action appeared in the 24-hour window.
Why it matters The fight is still open, and it is the live test of whether tokenized U.S. stocks on Robinhood Chain need the underlying company's consent. Anyone holding or researching those tokens should treat them as a separate Robinhood product, not as AMC shares, until a regulator or court says otherwise.
Read the context
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum layer-2 Robinhood launched on 1 July 2026 for tokenized stocks, DeFi, and onchain trading, with ETH used for gas. Stock Tokens are issued outside the United States by a Robinhood entity as separately issued instruments backed by underlying shares held with a U.S. custodian. Holders get price exposure, not voting rights in the listed company. AMC Entertainment's Adam Aron has demanded that Robinhood stop offering AMC-linked tokens and has threatened to involve the SEC. Tenev's 11 September post, which CoinDesk recapped the same day, set a test: if a product changes shareholder rights, replaces the official stock ledger, or creates new duties for the issuer or transfer agent, the company should be involved; if it is a separate instrument that only holds or references freely transferable shares, issuer consent should not be required. He compared the design to unsponsored ADRs, options, and structured products. Robinhood's official account posted only a generic investing-habit prompt during the 24-hour window. Aron has not withdrawn the SEC threat in the evidence reviewed here, so the legal question remains live for users of Robinhood Chain stock tokens.
Link to this story